| ||||||||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| 5-Series crash test rating Hey guys, my friend came across this on a Nissan Titan message board. They seem to think that the 2000 M5 is not a safe vehicle. I just don't like it when people make comments like that without knowing what they are talking about. The 5-Series did better than the Titan on the IIHS crash test. I know it's not much difference, but someone said, Quote:
http://www.titantalk.com/forums/show...2&page=1&pp=15 |
| |
| ||||
| I know what you mean, people underestimate the cars safety just by looking at it, when they see a small car they think it's unsafe, I work at MB, I hear people saying how unsafe the SMART car is because it's so small, but in crash test the SMART car did just as well as a E-Class, people don't know much about german engineering |
| |||
| u can have the greatest engineering in the world (and believe me i think the germans have it) but u simply can not over come the laws of physics, if u have two cars of equal build quality, but one weighs a thousand pounds more its gonna be safer, that SMART car im sure is made/engineered very well, but it stands no chance against something like a suburban hitting it |
| ||||
| There are about a billion different qualifications as to what is safer. Because first we have to think what is the wreck and situation? Let me ask you this, if you knew you were going to slide off the road into a field with no trees would you rather do it in a SUV or a roadster, and what about hitting a truck head on. All different situations change what we deam safe. I think a driver has about 100x more the input on how safe a car is relative to the cars design. |