Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigMakDaddy The problem is that most people are ignorant of the fact that a refurbished item is as good as a new one. It simply means that some parts have been replaced with equally good new parts. If the manufacturer is the one doing the replacing then it will be equally as good assuming that there was no damage to anything besides the actual parts replaced. Case and point, people cry like babies when they find out thier phone, laptop whatever they bought on eBay was refurbished. It's just a foolish assumption based on prejiduce towards that word "refurbished". In order to be built wasn't it assembled from parts in the first place anyways?? Poeple should think logically for a change instead of being afraid of the hype of a buzzword such as "refurbished". It's a meaningless word if the parts used were new and put on by a licensed professional. Assuming there was absolutely no other damage. |
Completely and wholesomely disagree with you. If I was dishing out over $30,000 for a BMW I would be disgusted to find out my new vehicle was damaged prior to being delivered. The reason I would buy a BMW in the first place would have to be the build quality of a factory job in German facilities by professionals in the field (exclude American/Mexican facilities). I rest comfortably knowing that but would lose sleep facing the fact that my brand new car was in fact damaged significantly during shipping. The damage I see to the E90's on the photos are extensive, not to mention panels being replaced that are not original VIN# matching but "factory replacements"....imagine that when someone is buying your car down the road? How do you explain it?
At an average price of $45,000 by the 70 perceived to be total losses would roughly equal around $3,150,000 lost, not at cost prices but at potential revenue. BMW would surely be insured against such losses and I would hope they claim this instead of reselling as "new".