| ||||||||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| lets say if they do invented a more powerful car than m cars..whats the difference its going to make? sure it be faster but its a lexus and you cant compare that to a bimmer, im pretty sure noone is going to buy a lexus n put things in it and take it to the track..very slim chance..as for m cars you can do alot to the exteriors as well as to the engine and its a track car!!!! Lexus=luxury |
| |
| |||
| I really love how no where do they mention that it's also a competitor to the New C63. OH wait that's because it's not even a threat to the C63! wierd.......
__________________ |
| |||
| I'm sorry Sir but not to get in it with you but The new C63 Stomps the New M3 sorry to be the one to tell you.
__________________ |
| |||
|
__________________ |
| |||
| come on shure the c63 will beat the new m3 in top speed and the acceleration is almost the same from 0-100k..but as an overall car..i think the new m3 got the title..as well as being on the track!! sure its a close one but im not shure about the m3 getting stomps!! the best way to compare these to is two have both of them on the track at once and experience hands on! |
| |||
| true very true BUT AMG does claim that the motor is very "Unstressed" at 457 HP in fact Mercedes claims that when you buy the car they will tell you how to get it to 580bhp with relative ease. I would really love to see BMW do that. Don't get me wrong I LOVE BMW I own a M3 (and it's not my first) but I don't think that the NEW M is gonna be all that great.
__________________ |
| |||
| wow i never heard of that b4..thats insane!! i agreed with u that the new m3 wont be that great..i think the e46 is way better..but if the new m3 do come out with csl..now that is another story..and i have heard rumor that theyr thinking about it. |
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ ![]() -= Burn all the letters, grow hatred against the ///M =- |
| ||||
| Quote:
the F has nothing on the 0-60mi of the m3 at 4.3 secs...according to this article, the F will do 4.9 secs on a 0-100kph...*yawns* now don't get me started with the handling...
__________________ ![]() 2000 e39 528iT, m5 bumper, aa brake vent grille, m-tech sports package, black kidney grilles, operational sharks fin, xenon interiors, smoked tails and cheeks, hid 8000k lows/fogs, hks intake, kicker solobaric s12l5, kicker zx750.1, remus single turbo 70td exhaust, cobra 9930, pioneer avic-s1, hella style projectors, 19" stern st-2 touring staggered 8.5 & 9.5, kumhos ecsta 35/235/19 & 30/265/19. |
| |||
| guys dont forget BMW's Gtr and CSl installments for the E39 body. plus this is no longer your average 6 cyl. M3. V8's are more fun to super or turbo charge |
| |||
| Quote:
yea but ur right bout doing stuff to the v8's but u got to wait at least a year for bmw to fix their problems with the m3, if there is any when they come out.and im pretty shure there are a whole bunch..after that the car should be great and u can do a lot with it!!! |
| |||
| The C63 AMG is not considered to be better than the e92 M3 by any reputable car magazine that I have read. They all say it is superior in power but lacks agility, handling and a feel that you are involved in the driving experience. The steering of the C63 is not as precise as the e92 M3. Also, the C63's steering is far more numb than the M3 despite the fact that the e92 gives less feedback than previous M3's. The C63 AMG is simply a straight line brute force muscle car. Mercedes knows this and did it purposefully because muscle cars are making a serious come back. They decided to focus on power and make it beefy as opposed to agile and involved.
__________________ |