| ||||||||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| c32 amg vs. m3 punch for punch which is better? http://autos.msn.com/research/compar...98527&v=t98065 |
| |
| ||||
| e55 amg vs. m5 http://autos.msn.com/research/compar...96759&v=t98587 noticably the e55 is better, because it is supercharged and such, and it has a bigger engine. . . take some stuff into consideration the m5 is not supercharged, it is older etc. . . just some food for though im im school so dont have a long time to type hopefully this will get enough response |
| |||
| I'd go M3 over C32; but E55 over M5 In terms of smaller more sporty cars, the M3 is awesome balance of handling, power, luxury and weight. The C32 is freaking awesome, but the autobox is what kills it for me. When it comes to super sedans, well the E55 is the reigning king. I doubt i'd hit the limits of its handling on 99% of roads i drive on. And unless i found a perfect section of road in the mountains would i really miss the handling of the M5. Since its more of a do everything, big car, i'd likely be driving it most of the time in traffic/city which i would actually prefer an auto (some of the hills in seattle suck).
__________________ |
| ||||
| Quote:
![]()
__________________ ![]() |