| ||||||||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| He has an Intake, exhaust, and a shark injector (which is worthless as far as power goes)....220rwhp is pretty damned good, although i would expect a bit more torque out of the 3.2l I put down 216/223...all i have is an ecis intake.
__________________ 2004 Subaru STi 1994 Ferrari 348GT Competizione |
| ||||
| Quote:
The compression tests show that cylinder 4 has a 9% decrease as compared to stock compression. The other 5 cylinders were only 2-3% decrease. Which however was ok according to Dave. But does anyone here know what that could mean? He fixed a few quirks for free, loose left drivers air duct, tightened a few sway bar links, and he was also kind enough to fix my billstein shocks which did not have the washers put in that keeps the shocks from "walking" as he termed it, or getting misaligned. Anyway, I'm happy with the results especially since it was done on a dynapack |
| ||||
| yeah i put down 234 whp on a mustang dyno (after tuning).....on my car man, nice job. and almost 260whp on the dyno jet before tuning.. my question for the masses is what dyno is the dyno pack most like??? or where does it fit in with the order of dynos Last edited by Dan : 06-14-2003 at 04:53 AM. |
| ||||
| Nice numbers, buddy! What year is your M3? Seems like your major mods are suspension/braking, with just intake/exhaust/software it seems like you've made a nice improvement over stock.
__________________ Scott Farmer ...now driving a Subaru STi |
| ||||
| dynapack is the dyno that hooks up to the hubs of a car, which is not cool IMHO. I'd say mustang>dynojet>dynopack
__________________ Beer Tech's Very Own Forum |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Scott Farmer ...now driving a Subaru STi |
| ||||
| Quote:
TurnerMotorsports has tried different dynos and the dynapack is one of the most accurate, according to Dave. |