| ||||||||||||||||||
| | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| I was trying to explain it to a friend and i was just getting confused myself. Can someone please explain the meaning and what it does and all? Thanks |
| |
| |||
| does my 1994 318is have vanos and if not, why the hell not
__________________ 94 318is mettalic green clear corners (front only) ractive intake new fockford component speakers 2 12 inch infinity subwoofers rockford 800a2 amp 1000 watt capacitor painted side skirts and front and rear bumpers engine rebuild bosal exhaust |
| |||
| It's different than Vtec because w/ vanos, cam timing changes. W/ Vtec, what changes is valve lift and durations due to another cam lobe that comes into use. Cam timing does not change w/ Vtec. This is a very simplified explanation, but thats how i've always understood it. Feel free to add to or correct what i've said if i'm wrong. Also, 94 318s don't have vanos
__________________ |
| |||
| This site below has a GREAT explaination, in detail, about what it does and how it works for BMWs. It's what I read when I was trying to figure it out. http://www.bmwworld.com/technology/vanos.htm |
| ||||
| ummmm, bimmer pride and all, but VANOS sux compared to VTEC. VTEC actually allows the profile of the cam to change at a certain RPM, as Alex Mc put it: "Its like switching from stock cams to schricks at some RPM" its what allows a tiny motor to make so much HP, because it's optimized for a high RPM as well as low.
__________________ 1973 Verona-ish 2002 2004 Mazda3 Hatch 1994 Honda CBR600 F2 |
| ||||
| VANOS WAS NOT MEANT TO MAKE BIG HP... Yes, you heard that right. VANOS is not meant to create a lot of horseopower. What is does do though is give you a lot of low end torque, often where the strait sixes lack the omph to get moving. This will allow you a more drivable car at all speeds, whereas when you have V-TECH you need to be driving over 6000RPMS (approximatly 80% of redline). Do you drive your Civic/Prelude at 6500RPMS often? I think not. VANOS is be better. Proof : M5 -Prince |
| |||
| Quote:
VTEC switches cam lobes at a pre-determined RPM, and for my car it switches at ~5000rpm, IIRC. Prelude, Accord, Civic, CL/TL all hit VTEC changeover around five grand. Only the S2000 revs high enough to warrant a 7k VTEC engagement rpm. Heck, my car redlines at 7200rpm. i-VTEC intelligent valve-control continuously adjusts the camshaft, just like the newest version of Vanos, although Vanos seems to be more concerned with maintaining torque than increasing high-end horsepower. Either is equally as effective, it's just a matter of which you prefer. Quote:
![]() Last edited by JRockCLS : 04-25-2002 at 08:31 PM. |