1991 VR-4 vs E36 M3 EVO

BlueIce · #1 (**permalink**) 11-08-2001, 06:32 PM

http://www.3si.org/vbb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=52379

Check that out. I am Blue55 on that website and I shot the guy down. Just read it and tell me what you think. He said the M3 was "modded" by Dinan also. A 1991 VR-4 bests at 5.2 or so to 60 and maybe 13.7 in the 1/4. What can an E36 EVO M3 do stock? Then plus it might have a chip/intake/exhaust. If your not signed up there I will post there for you....???

ESM3 · #2 (**permalink**) 11-08-2001, 06:37 PM

that guy is full of shit. Tell me one product dinan would make for a e36 M3 evo? Intake? No! Trottle Body? It already has 6! Exhaust? Maybe... but no way can a EVO be "tuned" by dinan unless they are international? Are they?

ESM3 · #3 (**permalink**) 11-08-2001, 06:39 PM

Also get your facts straight. M3s in europe were built in late 92 on. From 92-95 was 1st gen M3. 95-99 was the evo.

BlueIce · #4 (**permalink**) 11-08-2001, 06:53 PM

Alright chill Im sorry I didnt know which years are called EVO and which arent.

ESM3 · #5 (**permalink**) 11-08-2001, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueIce
Alright chill Im sorry I didnt know which years are called EVO and which arent.

Please... dont tell me to chill cause I wasnt going off on you.

IWANTABMW · #6 (**permalink**) 11-08-2001, 08:15 PM

BEEF!

Hellred · #7 (**permalink**) 11-09-2001, 08:33 AM

This would never happen. Bottom line is a older 4wd car will have so much more resistance at hign speeds becuase of the extra drive train components, not to mention less HP.

BullSHIT!!!

Greg